On 31 October 2011 12:27, Krnk Ktz <krnk...@gmail.com> wrote: > What should be done about ii? Are there features requests? I mean, it is a > great concept and works very well as it is, doesn't it?
It works well, but the source could do with a little cleaning up. There are some weird things, like fprintf(stderr, "%s", ...), no forward declarations, very few comments, for some reason it doesn't use stdio so has no buffering, etc. cls
