On 31 October 2011 10:59, Aurélien Aptel <[email protected]> wrote: > I also think libixp and ii should stay. I don't use them personally > but I think they follow the suckless philosophy.
ii does, but since 2007 the originally suckless libixp has been bloated up alongside wmii. The repository includes *broken* autogenerated manpages, and Ruby interpreter bindings. cls
