On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Bryan Bennett <bbenn...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think anyone here actually feels that the monolith that most configure > scripts become is a good thing. However, that's not within the scope of what's > going on here - the idea being that ./configure is a necessary part of > compiling > a sizable portion of software. Saying that we need a 'universal package > management' solution is absurd when we already have one.
now it sounds like you're saying autoconf is a universal package system, which is just as stupid as the original video -- # Kurt H Maier
