+1
Sent from my Palm Pre on the Now Network from Sprint On Oct 3, 2011 12:15 PM, Nick <suckless-...@njw.me.uk> wrote: On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 06:11:44PM +0200, Jakub Lach wrote: > +1 > > Dnia 3 października 2011 18:03 Petr Sabata &lt;con...@redhat.com&gt; napisał(a): > &gt; On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 03:37:15PM +0000, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > &gt; &gt; On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis &lt;eeke...@fastmail.fm&gt; wrote: > &gt; &gt; &gt; On another note entirely, would you mind not wraping your text so wide, > &gt; &gt; &gt; please? My eyes aren't too good so I use larger text, and anything > &gt; &gt; &gt; wrapped over about 75-80 columns double-wraps which is unpleasant to > &gt; &gt; &gt; read. It's not just you, there's quite a few people wrapping their > &gt; &gt; &gt; emails too wide. > &gt; &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; fmt(1) > &gt; &gt; > &gt; &gt; Can we unify our evangelist forces and standardize on a message > &gt; &gt; format? What about RFC 2646: text/plain; format=flowed? > &gt; &gt; Embedding any more formatting characters in emails than strictly > &gt; &gt; necessary sucks, and autogenerated HTML sucks hard. > &gt; &gt; > &gt; > &gt; +1 > Bam, Jakub is excluded from the debate. Incidentally, while we're trying to be fascist about email style, I hate 'contributions' of +1.