Bogdan Ionuț a écrit : > > > I can bet that it's uselessgap patch related. > > Indeed. > > Is there a rock solid version of that patch floating around? > Try the patch attached.
In fact, I'm using this vesion. To fix the aforementioned problem I had to change this line: unsigned int gap = c->isfloating ? 0 : c->mon->lt[c->mon->sellt]->addgaps ? gappx : 0; to: unsigned int gap = (c->isfloating || !c->mon->lt[c->mon->sellt]->arrange) ? 0 : c->mon->lt[c->mon->sellt]->addgaps ? gappx : 0;