Bogdan Ionuț a écrit :
> > > I can bet that it's uselessgap patch related.
> > Indeed.
> > Is there a rock solid version of that patch floating around?
> Try the patch attached.

In fact, I'm using this vesion.
To fix the aforementioned problem I had to change this line:

    unsigned int gap = c->isfloating ? 0 : c->mon->lt[c->mon->sellt]->addgaps ? 
gappx : 0;

to:

        unsigned int gap = (c->isfloating || 
!c->mon->lt[c->mon->sellt]->arrange) ? 0 : c->mon->lt[c->mon->sellt]->addgaps ? 
gappx : 0; 

Reply via email to