On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 02:50:48AM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > On 21 July 2011 02:19, Phillip Warner <phillip.c.war...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The only issue I have with the latest release is the file name 'lsx'. It's > > already taken. > > Hmm, that's unfortunate, but lsx has been named that since 2006 [1], > and some greedy alias is just annoying. That one package claims lrb, > lrx, lsb, lsx, rb, rx, rz, sb, sx, and sz, just for symlinks? Jesus. > Other distros appear to be fine, so I don't think it's really our > problem. > > [1]: http://tools.suckless.org/lsx
I remember Gentoo had this binary/symlink too, ... some time ago at least. They seem to get rid of it. -- # Petr Sabata
pgpAIDRYUh5Je.pgp
Description: PGP signature
