hi connor, > On 27 June 2011 08:13, a.l.e <ale.comp...@xox.ch> wrote: > > this is the main reason why i prefer wmii to dwm: i don't want to > > keep track of versions of dwm and of the patches i have applied. > > I can't help but think that the solution would be not to apply > patches. You don't really need to.
i agree. but i still prefer not to bother with applying patches at all. > > at least: dynamic tags > > 'Dynamic' is a rather overloaded term, but dwm's tagging *is* > dynamic... Moreso than wmii. does it start with only tag and i can add tags when i need them? i'm think of that kind of dynamic, not being able to add any window to a specific tag... ciao a.l.e
