On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 09:19:37PM +0200, Troels Henriksen wrote: > Sir Cyrus <sircy...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Not too clued in on coreutils alternatives, but what's wrong with > > busybox? > > Enormously ugly code (IMO worse than GNU coreutils, but in a different > way), and not much hackability.
I think you are exaggerating quite a bit. Most of the uglyness comes from the fact that they try to save each and every byte. > It's designed for something much different than sbase. True, but I think it's still be the best real world usable alternative. And patches are certainly welcome. You might also want to take a look at toybox: http://landley.net/code/toybox/ Marc -- Marc Andre Tanner >< http://www.brain-dump.org/ >< GPG key: CF7D56C0
