On 23 May 2011 20:08, Bjartur Thorlacius <svartma...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/23/11, Rob <robpill...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Finally, I have an editor in the works, unfinished, but I plan to show >> you lot at some point though</vapourware>. > Interesting. More details, or show me the code. What's novel about him?
Nothing novel I'm afraid, I'm still waiting for that idea, it's a stripped down vi clone and I'm planning on having the majority of the commands filter though external programs, like :s would use sed and so on. I'm busy with exams at the moment and I managed to brick the curses stuff, so I'd rather not upload until I've got it back together. On 24 May 2011 01:58, Connor Lane Smith <c...@lubutu.com> wrote: > On 23 May 2011 19:53, Rob <robpill...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I have to hit ^D twice before eof is reported > I wonder why this behaves differently to read(). Any ideas? Guessing stdio buffering, I tried stuff like setbuf(stdin, NULL), but it was having none of it. I suppose you could drop to read(fileno(..)) but .. well.. I'm sure fread() shouldn't be doing that in the first place. >> Also rm.c > Thanks. I've modified it slightly to avoid having to get the cwd, > since that opens a can of worms. (In short, POSIX makes it literally > impossible ensure that you've got the entire path.) I'm not sure whether moving up a directory will always work, what if you're in $HOME and do rm -r /tmp/dir1 ./dir2 (assuming /tmp/dir1 isn't empty, causing the chdir) it'll change to /tmp/dir1, remove entries in there, move up to /tmp, remove dir1, then attempt to remove dir2 (i.e. /tmp/dir2) when you actually mean $HOME/dir2. >> UK, right? Up late coding even with exams, I'm impressed. > I can't help it, I think I code obsessively. :p Haha, good luck with your exams if you keep that up! On 24 May 2011 11:45, Pierre Chapuis <catw...@archlinux.us> wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2011 11:05:55 +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > I don't understand why so few people on this list are interested in > Minix3. ~5k LOC for a POSIX-compatible kernel that can run most of > the software you need on a Unix box sounds nice to me. 5K? Why has no one mentioned this before?! On 24 May 2011 12:12, Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you want to go that route, I suggest to build the hardware yourself > as well, here is a brilliant guy who did it a couple of years ago: > > http://www.homebrewcpu.com/ Or if you don't have the time for hardware: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sNge0Ywz-M Cheers, Rob.
