On 23 May 2011 19:53, Rob <robpill...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a gripe about the fread() business - I have to hit ^D twice > before eof is reported - the first ^D causes fread() to return non-zero, > with text I entered previously, the second ^D causes fread() to return 0. > Probably not a major problem but here's a patch if anyone's interested.
I wonder why this behaves differently to read(). Any ideas? > Also rm.c Thanks. I've modified it slightly to avoid having to get the cwd, since that opens a can of worms. (In short, POSIX makes it literally impossible ensure that you've got the entire path.) > I've never ever found a use for -f, it's just a > pain having rm prompt me, so I've assumed an always present -f. Stick it > in if you're going for posix or whatever though. I agree, though I've added -f as a null flag, so it's ignored but doesn't cause an error either, since scripts quite sensibly use -f. > UK, right? Up late coding even with exams, I'm impressed. I can't help it, I think I code obsessively. :p > Finally, I have an editor in the works, unfinished, but I plan to show > you lot at some point though</vapourware>. Looking forward to it. imo we need a new editor... Thanks, cls
