On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Al Gest <himse...@gmail.com> wrote: > Evasive answer.
The question did not warrant more. > That doesn't provide any substance or merit to your belligerence. > Vitriol has also been seethed many times in the past on this very > list. You seem perfectly happy to provide redundant vitriol, so why > not provide the allegedly redundant 'why' as well? I already have. In this thread. Try to keep up. -- # Kurt H Maier
