On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Claudio <smo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Line buffer editing/positioning shouldn't be handled by st itself, it > should be delegated to an external tools (most likely the shell). Else > none of ^e, ^a, and such keystrokes should be available/hardcoded into > the terminal emulator. We should think in terms of "shell container" > rather than "terminal emulator". > Well, I'm pretty aware it's a bit extreme but hope someone else will > agree with me. > While I believe we need a simple text UIO widget that doesn't interpret terminal escapes et cetera, I can't see why the shell should even be awere of user keystrokes. Or are you suggesting something like rlwrap read | rc?
- [dev] st patch for draw() etc. Magnus Leuthner
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. Claudio
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. pancake
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. Magnus Leuthner
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. Anselm R Garbe
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. Nick
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. Anselm R Garbe
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. Connor Lane Smith
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. Aurélien Aptel
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. Aurélien Aptel
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. Bjartur Thorlacius
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. Aurélien Aptel
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. anonymous
- Re: [dev] st patch for draw() etc. anonymous