Hi guys, first of all, nice work Christian!
On 12 April 2011 00:45, pancake <panc...@youterm.com> wrote: > Slpm is probably much simpler than any ports system out there. It still needs > some love..But it works for my use cases. > > I recommend you to take a look on it. :) > > I already packaged musl, tcc and other stuff in slpm I don't see the point in a package _manager_ at all. What I do see is to have something like ports or build scripts that build/bootstrap the system and create binaries for future updating purposes (or security fixes). My personal choice/preference for this would be a ports system based on mk files -- some volunteers contributed early steps in this direction already. Ideally the system would be kept up to date using rsync or just git pull, that's what I intend with sta.li (once I have more extra time). Kind regards, Anselm
