I'll look at the source. I don't think I'll be able to accomplish much, but I really want an email client that isn't total ass.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis <eeke...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > On 3 Apr 2011, at 1:37 pm, Džen wrote: > >> I don't know what you guys think, but why not simply return messages >> which contain a text/html attachment to the sender? Maybe like this >> people might learn it someday and trash such shitty MUAs... > > I think some mailing lists do this. Some simply drop all attachments but > means you can't attach patches. Of course, the ML could just drop text/html > attachments. The big problem is not attachments but mail which does not have > a plain-text component. > > You know, we could all say we're using shitty MUAs because we see the > rendered HTML rather than the plain-text component. ;) Even HTML-only mail > can be converted to plain text. > > /me mumbles something about "suckless" and "MUA" :D >
