> Here's the patch to sic trunk to support this, it adds a new > argument (-a) that needs to be an base64 encoded SASL PLAIN response. Passing secrets in argv may be quite harmful. I can't imagine a use case where you'd not want a wrapper to read the secret in from a file or unnamed pipe.
- [dev] [sic] support for PLAIN SASL authentication on fr... Marcin Cieslak
- Re: [dev] [sic] support for PLAIN SASL authenticat... Bjartur Thorlacius