* Dieter Plaetinck <die...@plaetinck.be> [2010-11-21 17:12]: > On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 16:30:55 +0100 > v4hn <m...@v4hn.de> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 04:14:26PM +0100, sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de > > wrote: > > > Set of branches based on multiple patches, representing different > > > dmenu flavours -- like surf-flavour (e.g. vertical and token match > > > and xyz ), dwm-flavour, someones-music-player-flavour -- might make > > > more sense... not sure. > > > > That's another option, but keeping track of applied patches on each > > branch will become a pile of work imho, so this again would result in > > making the patches compatible.
No way around that. The point is it would be done once. > I would say we would make branches for single/multiple features based > on what makes most sense for each particular case. May be it's worth trying. I am still not sure since I don't have the numbers of who bundles patches how. Another kinda heretic idea might be to have fairly feature-rich branches and feature-removing patches. Just thinking loud.... cheers, -- stanio_
