On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 06:59:03PM -0500, TJ Robotham wrote: > Meh, I can't really think of a particularly compelling reason to put config.h > back in, but from the perspective of someone who was using it, its removal > feels strange and arbitrary and a bit like someone insisting that I get out of > bed at some early hour on a weekend. >
The only argument I have is that it "fits" more with how suckless software does things. Couple this with the fact that having it isn't any more bloat than not having it, and I'd think we ought to have it. Two minor arguments. 1. At the moment, keybindings are defined in dmenu.c and so if one wants to change keybindings, then one has to fiddle with that. All other suckless apps put the keybindings in config.h (afaik). 2. Future config options that don't fit easily as arguments would also go in config.h. Depending on how this filter thing filters out (ha. ha.) it could also plausibly go there. Peter -- sic dicit magister P PhD Candidate Collaborative Programme in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy University of Toronto http://individual.utoronto.ca/peterjh
