On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 05:02:02PM +0200, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > Excerpts from Anselm R Garbe's message of Tue Oct 19 15:14:15 +0200 2010: > > If this is part of the fedora package I'd be very happy with this. > I think that's what he's talking about > > Petr, as most users also need to patch dwm.c to make dwm fit their needs, this > seems pointless to me... maybe you should also respect dwm.c if it's put in > ~/.dwm? > that way, one can also just extract the mainline tarball or clone the hg repo > in > ~/.dwm and perform local modifications. I think it's the sanest way to package > dwm (if at all)
Good point. However, using a user dwm.c or cloned repo wouldn't respect the installed version from the package manager perspective. But I could go for, say, ~/.dwm/patches directory. Those would apply before every rebuild from the installed sources. Petr > > Best regards, > > Moritz > -- Petr 'contyk' Sabata, Red Hat, Brno () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
pgpZlb0CuLIe6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
