On Friday, September 3, 2010, yy <yiyu....@gmail.com> wrote: > It doesn't. libdraw uses a custom protocol to speak with devdraw, > which is a separate program and the only one in p9p which really > depends on xlib.
I'd still consider that a dependency, but a bit crazier. But fair enough I guess? > I understand what's the idea behind yours > libdraw, and I agree it is a fair goal but, please, change the name. We may go with the Edison option, though I don't know yet. Last time I brought this up it came out in favour of libdraw. > By the way, why a file per function? I think that's crazy, and don't > fit very well with the rest of everything-in-a-big-file suckless > projects. One file per function means a binary will only link the objects it needs, which helps keep binary size down when statically linking. Of course, programs needn't worry since they're guaranteed to link everything. I believe this is fairly standard. cls
