On Monday, August 30, 2010, pancake <panc...@youterm.com> wrote: > I also liked to know if the libdraw author is open to contributions (can I > commit > it directly?).
Yes, except, libdraw is currently waiting to be released as version 0.1, and ofc development would destabilize it. I'm waiting for Anselm to finalise the release of it and dmenu 4.2. I'm not sure what to do about that. Also, we should agree on additions to draw.h, since a library's API is the most important thing. But yeah, as long as code remains in the same style I have no problem with that. > The next step would probably think in making different backends to libdraw > instead of dupping it in swk. Though this is the next logical step, I'm a little hesitant. dmenu and dwm both depend heavily on X code. So either libdraw would only work with multiple backends for some projects, or we'd basically have to abstract a lot of Xlib, which seems like duplicating effort. The separation between libdraw and swk is a strange one. Thanks, cls
