On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 06:38:35PM -0400, TJ Robotham wrote: > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:07:11PM +0100, Connor Lane Smith wrote: > > ^D isn't an emacsism insofar as using it in bash when not at the end > > of the line works the same way. That said, I'm aware bash is a > > monster. However: > > Actually, it is an emacsism insomuch as bash's manpage specifically describes > the default line editing commands as emacs-style, in contrast to a vi-style > that > can be enabled in its place.
And sucks totally, because that's what bash is about.
