How exactly would they prevent you from using it?!
On 2/26/10, James PIC <james...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 6:39 PM, anonymous <aim0s...@lavabit.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 11:46:36AM -0500, Ray Kohler wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 11:37 AM, anonymous <aim0s...@lavabit.com> wrote:
>>> > On Sat, Jan 02, 2010 at 02:04:37PM +0100, hiro wrote:
>>> >> licenses are stupid
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > I agree. What should be done to place it into the public domain?
>>> > Will adding of "/* Public Domain */" into every source file be enough?
>>>
>>> Some parts of the world (I think DE is one of them) don't recognize
>>> the phrase "public domain" to mean anything in particular, so you have
>>> to write what you mean it to say. Something like "This software is in
>>> the public domain. That means that you can ..."
>>>
>> Here is a comment from SQLite 3 source code:
>> ** The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
>> ** a legal notice, here is a blessing:
>> **
>> ** May you do good and not evil.
>> ** May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
>> ** May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
>>
>> expr.c from OpenBSD uses just
>> /* Public Domain */
>>
>> pdksh has file LEGAL with this:
>> "
>> pdksh is provided AS IS, with NO WARRANTY, either expressed or implied.
>>
>> The vast majority of the code that makes pdksh is in the public domain.
>> "
>>
>> Here is what I have just found also: http://unlicense.org/. Probably
>> this is a good instruction for placing software into the public domain.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Our lawyer convinced me to stop releasing under WTFPL, because it
> doesn't prevent some evil bastard to re license my sources and prevent
> me from even using it.
>
> But that's the real world where people actually do care about licenses :)
>
> --
> http://jamespic.com/contact
> Customer is king - Le client est roi - El cliente es rei.
>
>