So there is consensus. Perhaps we can edit that stupid wikipedia page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability
On 2/24/10, Niki Yoshiuchi <aplu...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's actually my point - wikipedia is artificially enforcing notability so > we should artificially create notability.* > > *Not a serious suggestion. > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 1:26 PM, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Well, that's exactly the point. >> Wikipedia is trying to artificially enforce notability, which is of >> course going to fail miserably... >> >> On 2/24/10, Charlie Kester <corky1...@comcast.net> wrote: >> > On Wed 24 Feb 2010 at 07:15:42 PST hiro wrote: >> >>It seems like this guy is just mocking wikipedia's notability guideline. >> > >> > After reading the discussion, I'm beginning to wonder about wikipedia's >> > notability. If it's not mentioned on cat-v.org, it's not worth knowing >> > about. ;) >> > >> > If wikipedia deletes articles like the one on dwm, it will just be that >> > much less interesting to me. >> > >> > >> >> >
