Pierre Chapuis wrote: > There is almost no way to avoid name conflicts in OSS projects, I think > it's the job of the packagers to take care of that in each > distribution.
totally, yes. in debian (surf is waiting in the new queue), there's no other package called surf. so that other surf must be really, really awfully old/unmaintained/uninteresting that this wasn't even included in debian earlier. oiow: if it would my decision, i would stick with it. > The other project is packaged under the > name surf-ag. The two packages should conflict because they both > provide /usr/bin/surf but nobody ever complained about that rather, surf-ags /usr/bin/surf should be renamed to /usr/bin/surf-ag. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
