On (19/01/10 12:05), Nico Golde wrote: > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 12:05:07 +0100 > From: Nico Golde <n...@ngolde.de> > To: dev@suckless.org > Subject: Re: [dev] [SLOCK] is not safe > List-Id: dev mail list <dev.suckless.org> > X-Mailer: netcat 1.10 > > Hi, > * Andres Perera <andres...@gmail.com> [2010-01-18 22:16]: > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:23 PM, anonymous <aim0s...@lavabit.com> wrote: > > >> This thread is hilarious, I find it pretty funny that on a mailing list > > >> of the > > >> suckless project people are suggesting all kinds of weird things to > > >> solve this > > >> instead just using exec /usr/bin/dwm in ~/.xinitrc rather than > > >> /usr/bin/dwm. > > > > > > Just checked: I was always using exec in xinitrc. And I can still > > > killall slock. > > > > I'm also using exec dwm in xinitrc, as are most people that use startx or > > xinit. > > > > That doesn't solve anything. > > Huh? What is the issue then? The original mail stated the problem is putting > the shell into background by ctrl-z and then killing slock which clearly > doesn't work if you exec into startx. > > Cheers > Nico
Problem here is not using exec startx or startx & exit, not using or not using exec in xinitrc/xsession! -Ph -- Premysl "Anydot" Hruby, https://www.redrum.cz/ - I'm a signature virus. Please add me to your signature and help me spread!
