What about this one? http://xinutec.org/~pippijn/en/why-not-use_java.xhtml
Moritz On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 02:09:30AM +0100, Uriel wrote: > I think Paul Graham's criticism's are much more relevant and timeless: > http://www.paulgraham.com/javacover.html > > In short, the real problems with java are inherent to its design > motivation, and can't be fixed with new features, libraries or other > such 'improvements' (actually in many ways the features that they have > added to Java have made things worse, auto-boxing and generics are a > really huge mes of almost C++ proportions, nobody really understands > how they work, not even the people that designed them.) > > > uriel > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 1:37 AM, pancake <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is for Java 1.0.2 > > > > We are in 1.7 I wonder if those logical side effects are still there. > > > > On Nov 18, 2009, at 7:57 PM, "Michael P. Soulier" > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> On 18/11/09 Michael P. Soulier said: > >> > >>> On 18/11/09 Uriel said: > >>> > >>>> http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/java > >> > >> And another http://www.cs.arizona.edu/projects/sumatra/hallofshame/ > >> > >> Mike > >> -- > >> Michael P. Soulier <[email protected]> > >> "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It > >> takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite > >> direction." --Albert Einstein > > > > > >
