On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Julien Pecqueur (JPEC)<j...@julienpecqueur.com> wrote: > I think the ctrl+alt combinaison suck : you need two hands for killing a > client...
Not so, at least on my IBM keyboards and Thinkpad laptop keyboards. Left pinky and thumb on ctrl and alt, 2nd (pointer) finger on c. > Alt is better (Windows key too). Not all keyboards have the Windows key. If I had such a keyboard, I agree, I'd use that key. > Finally a dwm user should don't use suck - more application wich use the alt > key ! ^^ You mean like Firefox? Thunderbird? Gnumeric? etc.? This would save a lot of power, because the computer would be useless and thus I wouldn't turn it on. > > JPEC > > Donald Allen <donaldcal...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >>I think the default key bindings for dwm are a unfortunate in some >>cases. For example, alt-f, a natural choice for *f*loat mode, >>conflicts with pulling down the File menu in many applications from >>the keyboard. alt-T similarly conflicts with using the Tools menu in >>Firefox from the keyboard. >> >>I realize that these bindings can be changed. But that requires some >>work (and knowledge of C) on the part of the user. I'm talking about >>the choice of the defaults. Perhaps the keys modified by alt should >>instead be modified by ctrl-alt by default? And similarly, alt-shift >>-> ctrl-alt-shift? I am going to test this idea by modifying my setup. >>I'll let you know how it works out. >> >>/Don >> >
