On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Preben Randhol<rand...@pvv.org> wrote: > So what you are saying is that if a problem is making the code more > complex one define that this is not a problem and ignore it?
Yes. > It is like saying all chemical/physical models should be ideal and sod > the real world if the simulations don't add up to reality. This is, in fact, how science progresses. Cf. the ideal gas law, in fact. > What I want is not the smallest neatest code that doesn't model the > problem-space and is semi-usable. That is not a suckless code (well > except for the programmer) If you require weird functional acrobatics to manage your workflow, the problem probably isn't the window manager. > This said I'm perfectly happy with having patches that > add the per-tag functionality. And this is the right answer. Keep the window manager small and ideal, and let people do bizarre things to it outside of the main tree. -- # Kurt H Maier
