On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Antoni Grzymala<ant...@chopin.edu.pl> wrote: > David Tweed dixit (2009-07-07, 16:58): >> system, the "full" display-postscript compositing engine behind "full" >> GNUstep and all those other "new" windowing systems that never >> actually got anywhere near completion because the only thing one could >> do with them in their current state was development. > > Hasn't this stuff ended up in OS X?
I'm not aware of that: I thought that all the quartz code was developed internally by apple (possibly using the original NextStep code) and didn't use any of the GNUstep "attempted reimplementation" code. (To be clear: I'm not talking about the concepts developed by NextStep being used elsewhere but the actual GNUstep codebase not getting near completion in the above.) But I could be wrong about the source code's ancestry. -- cheers, dave tweed__________________________ computer vision reasearcher: david.tw...@gmail.com "while having code so boring anyone can maintain it, use Python." -- attempted insult seen on slashdot
