2009/7/2 Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com>: > 2009/7/2 Jukka Salmi <j+...@2009.salmi.ch>: >> Anselm R Garbe --> dwm mail list <d...@suckless.org> (2009-07-02 16:53:20 >> +0100): >>> are you aware of anyone still using a classic multihead setup? (No Xinerama) >> >> I am (finally got mga(4) to work in a dual head setup on NetBSD/i386 5.0 >> with native Xorg...). I've never used Xinerama on this system but it's >> probably not what I want since the two monitors connected to it have >> different sizes and resolutions. >> >> >>> I wonder if it'd be worth the effort to support that as well, since we >>> got the Monitor structure now in dwm. >> >> I didn't follow the recent dwm changes, but I'll try to catch up in the >> next few days. If it's not too much effort I'd welcome dwm support for >> multihead setups. > > I think it's just a matter of 30 LOC or so to achieve classic > multihead support with the current state.
Well I rechecked the source and it would make dwm considerably more complex, especially the root window checks would be all over the place. No no ;) Classic multihead support is achieved using the classic way: DISPLAY=:0.0 dwm & DISPLAY=:0.1 dwm & etc Now I'm at simplifying what has appeared so far... Kind regards, Anselm
