Right, and along those lines, I'll refuse to use Linux because Linus
uses emacs and git while I prefer vim and hg...
Why not just appreciate that there's a somewhat high-level
specification that's possibly machine verifiable, rather than having
to rely on an English spec? Domain-specific languages are great,
though they could have done better than choose XML for the syntax.
On Jun 23, 2009, at 1:03 AM, Uriel wrote:
Because using XML to generate C code is such a wonderful idea!
I propose we rewrite dwm and wmii in pure xml and then use XSLT to
generate C code that we can compile. That is what people call progress
in the software industry!
Erik Naggum[1] would be proud!
uriel
[1] http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/xml/s-exp_vs_XML
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:50 AM, Ammar James<lone.no...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Just ran into this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XCB
Any thougths on it being a suckless alternative to Xlib?
