On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:38:22 -0400 Alex Kilgore <adkilg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hiro wrote: > > What's wmii-X? > > > > > I think he meant X as in <any version>, and anyways, I think > that in this case, the whole "dwm v wmii" thing is merely a matter of > personal preference > Anyways, I at first thought in a similar fashion about > stacking as the OP until I got used to it, and eventually I found I > like the stacking better because it makes long titlebars more > readable for one, and in terms of workspaces vs tagging, I don;t see > why having "workspaces" instead of tagging would be advantageous. > Alex > Yeah the stacked layout in wmii is pretty good. I just find it bothersome that other (unfocused) windows' titles can appear both at the top and at the bottom of the screen. I would prefer it if they would all be at the top. Dieter
