FYI there seems to have been an issue with svn-role tonight not running as
expected.

I logged in to svn-qavm, did an svn cleanup && svn up on ~svnsvn/src/svn
(which is the working copy where the merges are performed by the cron job)
and run the cron job command manually - the expected backports were merged
as expected (see below and r19362226).

/Daniel

Den fre 17 juli 2026 kl 08:40 skrev <[email protected]>:

> Author: svn-role
> Date: Fri Jul 17 06:40:24 2026
> New Revision: 1936225
>
> Log:
> Merge r1936209 from trunk:
>
>  * r1936209
>    Remove tools/dev/wc-format.py.
>    Justification:
>      - `svn info` displays working copy format now.
>      - wc-format.py doesn't support working copy format 32.
>    Notes:
>      Can be merged without restarting soak period due to tools/ exception,
>      but cannot be merged after 1.15.0 release because it removes
>      functionality.
>    Votes:
>      +1: ivan, dsahlberg
>
> Deleted:
>    subversion/branches/1.15.x/tools/dev/wc-format.py
> Modified:
>    subversion/branches/1.15.x/   (props changed)
>    subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
>
> Modified: subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS   Fri Jul 17 06:33:39 2026
> (r1936224)
> +++ subversion/branches/1.15.x/STATUS   Fri Jul 17 06:40:24 2026
> (r1936225)
> @@ -67,18 +67,6 @@ Veto-blocked changes:
>  Approved changes:
>  =================
>
> - * r1936209
> -   Remove tools/dev/wc-format.py.
> -   Justification:
> -     - `svn info` displays working copy format now.
> -     - wc-format.py doesn't support working copy format 32.
> -   Notes:
> -     Can be merged without restarting soak period due to tools/ exception,
> -     but cannot be merged after 1.15.0 release because it removes
> -     functionality.
> -   Votes:
> -     +1: ivan, dsahlberg
> -
>   * r1936214
>     Remove the build-svn-deps-win.pl script. It currently doesn't work and
>     CMake/vcpkg is the preferred way to build on Windows.
>
>

Reply via email to