Evgeny Kotkov <[email protected]> writes:
> I think it would be nice to have all of them merged before we roll RC1, but
> at the same time only the first two (r1931549 and r1931570) seem to look like
> strict blockers for RC1.
Hi all,
A gentle reminder: we're currently blocked from making an RC1 by the following
two nominations:
* r1931549
Use bytewise content comparison in the "is the file modified?" working copy
checks if we have the pristine file content.
Justification:
Avoid changing the file comparison characteristics for working copies with
pristine contents.
Notes:
Discussed in
https://lists.apache.org/thread/128rgf7ozn72ljfzn7o18gfhb9l43y26
Votes:
+1: kotkov
* r1931570
Forward the allow_unver_obstructions argument from the deprecated function.
Justification:
Without this, svn_client_checkout3 doesn't care about the argument and the
docstrings doesn't match implementation (see the r1931298 group).
Votes:
+1: dsahlberg, kotkov
Once we have both of them merged, I'll start looking towards rolling RC1.
Thanks,
Evgeny Kotkov
