Den mån 16 dec. 2024 kl 12:20 skrev Thomas Singer via dev < dev@subversion.apache.org>:
> Hi Nathan, > > Could it be a plan to offer scripts that build the binaries in a docker > container? We have our own scripts that do that, but they often break > with new releases. > > -- > Best regards, > Thomas Singer > syntevo GmbH > Hi Thomas, I think that may be a valuable contribution, although I'm not sure if we have any resources to maintain it. If you already have such a script, would you be willing to contribute it? Cheers, Daniel > > On Sun, 15-Dec-24 17:22, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'd like to start a conversation about getting 1.15.0 released. > > > > Why a 1.15.0 release: Much work has taken place on trunk since 1.14.0 > > and I think it is good for SVN's users, and for our own project > > planning, to get the new features released. > > > > You might have noticed me dabbling in the 1.15 release notes in > > staging recently. :-) Right now, trunk has: > > * Pristines On Demand > > * Multi-WC > > * Streamy Checkouts > > * New CMake build > > > > I asked myself, where to start the discussion? > > > > I think the first question is which type of release should we plan > > for, Regular or LTS? > > > > Paraphrasing our roadmap [1]: > > > > * Regular releases are supported 6 months. > > > > * LTS releases are supported at least 4 years and at least 3 months > > after the next LTS. > > > > Currently one LTS line is supported: 1.14.0 was announced in May 2020, > > so it honored 4 years of support earlier this year, and support > > continues until 3 months after the next LTS release. > > > > If 1.15.0 is Regular, then 1.14.x support will outlive 1.15.0, and > > continue until 3 months beyond the next LTS. That could be 1.16.0 or > > later. > > > > If 1.15.0 is LTS, then 3 months after 1.15.0, the 1.14.x release line > > can become EOL. > > > > Of course, there are many things to consider for a 1.15.0 release. I'm > > asking this question first because choosing a release type helps set > > expectations and affects further decisions... > > > > Also, I know that any discussion about 1.15.0 can pull in some... (how > > shall I phrase it?) controversial issues. I personally had some strong > > feelings in the past but I'm leaving them in the past to focus on the > > greater good. I hope that can be the theme. > > > > [1] https://subversion.apache.org/roadmap.html#release-planning > > > > Please share your thoughts... > > > > Nathan > >
