Sorry. That's my fault. I created a backport branch `1.14.x-r1921505` when nominating the revision, but forgot to add a `Branch` declaration for the nomination.
Fixed in r1921922. On 2024/11/18 1:10, Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > Hi, > > This change doesn't apply cleanly to 1.14.x. It seems r1880967 (and the > followup r1884640) added some typemaps which this change builds upon. I don't > understand the swig bindings enough to see if we could merge the above two > revisions or if that would be an incompatible change to the 1.14.x series (in > which case we need a separate backport branch for r1921505). > > Kind regards, > Daniel > > On 2024/10/24 03:13:18 jun6...@apache.org wrote: >> Author: jun66j5 >> Date: Thu Oct 24 03:13:17 2024 >> New Revision: 1921524 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1921524&view=rev >> Log: >> * STATUS: Nominate r1921505 >> >> Modified: >> subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS >> >> Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1921524&r1=1921523&r2=1921524&view=diff >> ============================================================================== >> --- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original) >> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Thu Oct 24 03:13:17 2024 >> @@ -58,6 +58,13 @@ Candidate changes: >> votes: >> +1: jun66j5 >> >> + * r1921505 >> + Make swig-py compatible with SWIG 4.3.0. >> + Justification: >> + Ditto. >> + votes: >> + +1: jun66j5 >> + >> Veto-blocked changes: >> ===================== -- Jun Omae <jun6...@gmail.com> (大前 潤)
