On 2024-01-22 04:05:04 +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 13.01.2024 09:58, Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Since there wasn't any replies to this and I think the code was working > > fine in all my tests, I comitted as r1915214. Although I finally decided > > to solve the spurious revert messages in a different way, see a separate > > followup/committ e-mail. > > I think you just made the code more complicated for no good reason. The > situation you described and fixed applies only to working copies that are > shared by different users.
Note that in my case, the working copy was not shared by different users. It just happened that some files had a different owner (as I had done a "cp" under root by mistake). -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
