Den tors 30 nov. 2023 kl 05:57 skrev Nathan Hartman < hartman.nat...@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 11:52 PM <hartmannat...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Author: hartmannathan > > Date: Thu Nov 30 04:52:20 2023 > > New Revision: 1914221 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1914221&view=rev > > Log: > > * STATUS: Nominate r1914220. > > > > Modified: > > subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS > > > > Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS > > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1914221&r1=1914220&r2=1914221&view=diff > > > ============================================================================== > > --- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original) > > +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Thu Nov 30 04:52:20 2023 > > @@ -22,6 +22,13 @@ Candidate changes: > > votes: > > +1: rhuijben > > > > + * r1914220 > > + Update copyright year to 2023. > > + Justification: > > + To show correct year in upcoming release. > > + Votes: > > + +1: hartmannathan > > > I don't know whether this really needs a nomination and vote -- I > looked for precedents and found that sometimes the year bump was > committed directly on a A.B.x branch, sometimes committed to trunk and > merged without a nomination/vote to a A.B.x branch, and sometimes done > via a vote... So I went ahead and took the most conservative approach, > but if it's overkill, please let me know for the future. > > Thanks, > Nathan > It doesn't hurt I guess. I'm +1 for changing the year ;-) so I went ahead and approved. Not sure if it would have needed three +1 but I don't think anyone can veto... /Daniel
