Den sön 23 apr. 2023 kl 04:21 skrev Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com
>:

> On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 2:02 PM Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 6:25 PM <dsahlb...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Author: dsahlberg
>> > Date: Sat Apr 22 16:25:30 2023
>> > New Revision: 1909352
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1909352&view=rev
>> > Log:
>> > * CHANGES: Document r1909351
>> ...
>> > +  - Other tool improvements and bugfixes:
>> > +    * Storing passwords in plain text on disk is again enabled by
>> default (r1909351)
>>
>> I would suggest rephrasing this a bit, to make it clear that we simply
>> re-enabled the *possibility* of storing passwords in plain text (on
>> Unix, if the runtime configuration allows it and no better password
>> stores are available). Obviously that's a bit long, but I can't come
>> up with a good concrete suggestion right now, sorry :-). But as it
>> reads there it could be interpreted as "wow? what?".
>>
>> --
>> Johan
>
>
>
> Maybe something along the lines of:
>
> "When building on Unix, include support for the simple (plaintext)
> credential store unless disabled at configure time with
> --disable-plaintext-password-storage (r1909351)."
>

Thanks for reviewing! I originally copied the text from 1.12.0 and sort of
s/disable/enable/ and I agree it didn't turn out very good.

Nathan's suggestion has a much better wording, but it sounds a little bit
as it is a new feature. Maybe that is what we want, but I'll throw in
another option detailing that we are actually reverting the change from
1.12.0:

"When building on Unix, change default configure option to enable support
for the simple (plaintext) credential store unless disabled at configure
time with --disable-plaintext-password-storage. This reverts r1845377
(r1909351)."

It would feel better if we are very clear that we revert a previous change,
in case someone has looked at 1.12 and thought "finally, the plaintext
cache is disabled" and now realize they have to change their build settings.

Kind regards,
Daniel

Reply via email to