On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 6:21 AM Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote: > > Nathan Hartman wrote on Sun, May 15, 2022 at 03:36:05 -0400: > > On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 8:57 AM <danie...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Sat May 14 12:57:32 2022 > > > @@ -39,6 +39,15 @@ Candidate changes: > > > votes: > > > +1: rhuijben > > > > > > + * r1900882 > > > + Replace a call to a function deprecated upstream. > > > + Justification: > > > + No-op on Python 3.2 and newer, but will allow Subversion 1.14.x to > > > be > > > + built by future Python 3.12. Note that Python 3.2 was released 9 > > > years > > > + before Subversion 1.14.0. > > > + Votes: > > > + +1: danielsh > > > + > > > > Should futatuki's follow-up in r1900890 be added to this nomination? > > Per <https://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.14#python2>, > breaking py2 support in a 1.14.x patch release is permitted. Thus, > we are not required to add r1900890 to this nomination.
Agreed. I asked just in case you missed it. > If we do nominate r1900890, here's my +0 for it. (Not +1 because > I haven't audited all callsites that «import gen_base».) Understood. Thanks. > > Also should this reference SVN-4899? > > r1900922. Thanks for adding that. Cheers, Nathan
