Den tors 7 apr. 2022 kl 13:43 skrev Julian Foad <julianf...@apache.org>:
> TL;DR: are we OK to merge the pristines feature
> ('pristines-on-demand-on-mwf' branch) to trunk soon, like early next week?
>
> As said in "A status review" [1] in the long thread "A two-part vision
> for Subversion and large binary objects.", next steps are reviewing and
> handling the outstanding issues, and proposing merge to trunk. I think
> these can be done in parallel as I don't see any that would block a
> merge to trunk. So here is the proposal to merge to trunk, and then
> complete the remaining work on trunk.
>
> It feels to me like there is general consensus that this feature is
> taking a form that will be acceptable for a first release of it (while
> not perfect), and consensus for proceeding to get it into trunk and
> subsequently including it in the next release. I'm too close to it to
> make an independent assessment. Can anybody else comment?
>
> If no objections, I plan to merge to trunk early next week.
>
I can't really make a judgement on the "ready to merge" question, just
wanted to add a data point that I've built TortoiseSVN with the
pristines-on-demand-on-mwf branch and made a few successful tests on the
command line tools.
The GUI complained that I need to upgrade my working copy after I did `svn
upgrade --compatible-version=1.15`, I hope to look into this during the
weekend.
If everything goes well I'm planning to use this as my daily driver on a
mix of 1.8- and 1.15-version working copies. (Yes, I'm aware of the risks).
Kind regards,
Daniel Sahlberg
