On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 10:07:15AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > We should have enough signatures according to ASF rules (need 3 signatures > > by PMC members), but not for our own cross-platform testing requirements > > (there is only one windows signature so far). > > > > Should we fail to meet our own higher standard, we can fall back on ASF > > rules, meaning we could release with the signatures we have available now. > > > > While not required this time around, the RM could in principle count > > their own signature against the 3 required by ASF. > > > > I don't mean to discourage further testing/signing; if you can test these > > releases on Windows or other platforms which have not yet been covered in > > some way, this would be very welcome. Testing from people outside the PMC > > is also always welcome, even though a signature won't be useful in this > > case. > > > > Cheers, > > Stefan > > > I'm a little bit confused... Per HACKING we need three +1 votes from PMC > members, at least one of which is for each platform (Windows and Unix). We > have already met this requirement for both 1.14.2 and 1.10.8, haven't we?
Oh, so the rules have been updated? Sorry for the confusion. I still had the old rules in mind, which required 3 votes for each *nix and windows.
