Den tors 31 mars 2022 kl 02:21 skrev Nathan Hartman < hartman.nat...@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 4:10 PM <hartmannat...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Author: hartmannathan >> Date: Wed Mar 30 20:10:06 2022 >> New Revision: 1899394 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1899394&view=rev >> Log: >> * branches/1.14.x/STATUS: Nominate r1896609 (bump copyright year to 2022) >> >> Modified: >> subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS >> >> Modified: subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS >> URL: >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS?rev=1899394&r1=1899393&r2=1899394&view=diff >> >> ============================================================================== >> --- subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS (original) >> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS Wed Mar 30 20:10:06 2022 >> @@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ Candidate changes: >> votes: >> +1: markphip >> >> + * r1896609 >> + Bumps copyright date to 2022 >> + Justification: >> + Show correct year in output. >> + Votes: >> + +1: hartmannathan >> + >> Veto-blocked changes: >> ===================== > > > > We should try to get the above backport nomination approved, both for > 1.10.8 and 1.14.2, because it would look rather silly to release with last > year's copyright date. > > I am in the process of digging through numerous changes on trunk to see if > there are additional ones appropriate for backport that were missed. > > The others that I have nominated so far are, like the above, very low risk. > > I'm trying to pick beneficial ones that I believe won't instigate any > last-minute complications like test failures etc. > Thanks for doing this! I've voted for them and while not explicitly mentioned as exceptions in the voting process, I believe it doesn't count as core code and thus I've also approved them. They should be part of tomorrow's backport batch. I will be on the road from early Friday morning (CET) until Sunday afternoon, but I'll try to keep an eye on the backports to make sure everything goes smooth. /Daniel
