On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 8:28 AM Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Den ons 30 mars 2022 kl 00:54 skrev Jun Omae <jun6...@gmail.com>: >> >> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:20 AM Daniel Sahlberg >> <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Does anyone with experience in the bindings have time to look at the >> > backport of r1897441 (in 1.14.x/STATUS)? It was nominated by jun66j5, >> > however it doesn't apply cleanly. I think it would work if at least >> > r1885008 is added to the group, but probably also r1886858 and r1886872. >> > >> > It would be good to have it merged if it increases test coverage. >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > Daniel >> >> Sorry, I noticed that the nomination r1897441 is not needed for 1.14.x. >> Removed it from STATUS file. >> >> However, I get 2 failures from 1.14.x/win-tests.py on Windows >> (tests for swig-py, swig-pl and javahl pass). >> >> FAIL: mod_authz_svn_tests.py 10: repos-relative access file >> FAIL: mod_authz_svn_tests.py 11: repos-relative access file with bad >> repository URL >> >> It seems to be necessary to merge r1884474 to fix. > > > That one seems quite straight forward. Feel free to nominate!
Mark nominated it, and I just tested it again. However, r1884474 only seems to fix mod_authz_svn_tests.py#10. mod_authz_svn_tests.py#11 still fails for me after merging r1884474. I haven't looked into it, and have to run right now. It's very well possible that I have done something wrong or that my test-setup is broken locally, don't know yet. In case anyone want to take a closer look, here is the dav-fails.log in attachment. If no one else beats me to it, I'll take another look later tonight or tomorrow. -- Johan
dav-fails.log
Description: Binary data
