Daniel Shahaf wrote: > It doesn't seem to be an old function; the docstring says (in a part I > snipped) it's new in 1.15. However, I don't think that changes the answer. > Done in r1899004.
Oh, just older than my involvement then! Thanks. - Julian
Daniel Shahaf wrote: > It doesn't seem to be an old function; the docstring says (in a part I > snipped) it's new in 1.15. However, I don't think that changes the answer. > Done in r1899004.
Oh, just older than my involvement then! Thanks. - Julian