Den fre 12 nov. 2021 kl 13:57 skrev Eugeny Sosnovsky <eugeny.sosnov...@silverfirsoftware.com>: > > To whom it may concern, > On October 21, 2021, I have inquired on the SVN user mailing list about any > means to use glob patterns in svn:auto-props that would be more powerful than > the Unix fnmatch patterns it currently uses. > > The need to do so was driven by a desire to have different svn:auto-props > settings for "CMakeLists.txt" (a script file written in the CMake language), > and all other "*.txt" files (general plain text files). It's not too > significant in this particular case, in that they are both plain text files, > but I can imagine a scenario where the inability to set one property for a > specific set of files with a given extension, and another property for all > other files with this extension, would be limiting. The fnmatch glob syntax > does not easily allow this, but the GNU extensions to it allow, for example, > the use of "!(CMakeLists).txt", which will match anything that "*.txt" would > match, except "CMakeLists.txt". For those unfamiliar with the GNU extensions, > this is a very good summary (written here for a Python library that > duplicates the functionality): > https://facelessuser.github.io/wcmatch/fnmatch/ > > I looked at the SVN DesignNotes wiki, and was unable to find any entries for > something like this. So here I am requesting this feature. Please let me know > if you have any questions about it. Looking forward to hearing from you!
I'm making another quote [1] from the same e-mail thread as in your last message: > On 11.06.2020 09:42, Branko Čibej wrote: > > About feature design -- unfortunately we can't just invent a syntax that > > would invert the meaning of the glob patterns in svn:ignore, as that > > would break backward compatibility. Any ideas for a solution would be > > most welcome. I'm not opposing the idea but implementing the GNU extensions might break someone's existing svn:auto-props. It would obviously be possible to make a compile time switch but I don't know how many are rolling their own releases. Anyhow, please feel free to submit an idea for a new solution and preferably a patch. Maybe a new svn:auto-props-ext? (In which case there should also be companion svn:ignore-ext etc. and a precedance rule) Kind regards, Daniel [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-users/202006.mbox/%3ced8b17ea-4116-8007-d660-74ac06791...@apache.org%3e > > Eugeny Sosnovsky > Chief Engineer at Silver Fir Software > >