Great, thanks all!
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:20 AM Karl Fogel <kfo...@red-bean.com> wrote: > > On 09 Mar 2021, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >Thanks for the patch. dev@, anyone wants to review/apply this? > > r1887464, and thanks for the poke, Daniel. > > The original text was clearly a typo; I confirmed with some > grepping and code exploration. Thanks for the patch, Yutian. > > Best regards, -Karl > > >Yutian Li wrote on Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 20:58:05 -0500: > >> [[[ > >> Fix a comment in svn_fs_fs_private.h > >> > >> * subversion/include/private/svn_fs_fs_private.h: Fix comment > >> ]]] > >> > >> Index: subversion/include/private/svn_fs_fs_private.h > >> =================================================================== > >> --- subversion/include/private/svn_fs_fs_private.h (revision 1886964) > >> +++ subversion/include/private/svn_fs_fs_private.h (working copy) > >> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ typedef struct svn_fs_fs__id_part_t > >> svn_revnum_t revision; > >> > >> /* sub-id value relative to REVISION. Its interpretation depends on > >> - the part itself. In rev_item, it is the index_index value, in others > >> + the part itself. In rev_item, it is the item_index value, in others > >> it represents a unique counter value. */ > >> apr_uint64_t number; > >> } svn_fs_fs__id_part_t;
