On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 7:00 PM Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@apache.org> wrote: > Just as a heads up: I was ready to vote for an approve r1880192 (issue > #4862 -- Merge: the resulting mergeinfo is non-deterministic) for > 1.14.x, but as Yasuhito also discovered: there is an EOL issue in the > test, which makes it fail on Windows. So it really needs to be > accompanied by the r1881985 group. > > If anyone can add a third vote to the r1881985 group, they get the > other approval as a bonus :-). > > (cc'ing Julian and Nathan personally, because they have voted already > for the first issue, so already know the context)
Thanks for the heads up and all your work to push this train forward. Yes, the r1881985 group fixes a test that was added in r1880192. (Probably it should have been grouped with r1880192 in STATUS, but since they have different combinations of votes, I'm leaving them separate.) I added my vote to the r1881985 group, approving. Accordingly I converted your vote on r1880192 to +1 and moved both groups to Approved together. Done in separate commits r1884596, r1884597, r1884598. The above is for 1.14.x; I haven't done 1.10.x yet... Cheers, Nathan
