On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 8:52 AM Daniel Sahlberg <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> wrote: >...
> As for the question in your other mail (the reply to Daniel Shahaf) > regarding the desire to keep the URLs. My initial question to Daniel > Stenberg was if they would consider CNAME:ing svn.haxx.se to my server > and he seemed ok with that, however we have not reached a formal agreement. > I assume it would be even easier for him to CNAME it to a server provided > by the ASF. > I would suggest a CNAME to svn-haxx.apache.org, which Infra would further CNAME to (say) svn-qavm. That would mean Mr Stenberg wouldn't ever need to alter his CNAME record, while the ASF could repoint svn-haxx.a.o at-will over time. Today, the "301 mapping server" could be svn-qavm, but maybe we'd do something different in a few years. Cheers, -g
