svn-r...@apache.org wrote on Thu, 28 May 2020 04:00 -0000:
> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/subversion/libsvn_client/mtcc.c Thu May 28
> 04:00:12 2020
> @@ -453,7 +453,8 @@ mtcc_verify_create(svn_client__mtcc_t *m
>
> if (op)
> return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_FS_ALREADY_EXISTS, NULL,
> - _("Path '%s' already exists"),
> + _("Path '%s' already exists, or was created
> "
> + "by an earlier operation"),
> new_relpath);
Is "was created" in the correct tense? This error message is triggered
before the RA session is opened, so it shouldn't imply that the earlier
operation completed successfully.
> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/subversion/tests/cmdline/svnmucc_tests.py Thu
> May 28 04:00:12 2020
> @@ -534,7 +534,8 @@ def svnmucc_type_errors(sbox):
> xtest_svnmucc(sbox.repo_url,
> - ["svnmucc: E160020: Path 'Z' already exists"],
> + ["svnmucc: E160020: Path 'Z' already exists, or was created "
> + "by an earlier operation"],
> '-m', '',
> 'mkdir', 'A/Z',
> 'put', sbox.ospath('file'), 'A/Z')
> @@ -576,7 +577,8 @@ def svnmucc_propset_and_put(sbox):
> # Put same file twice (non existing)
> xtest_svnmucc(sbox.repo_url,
> - ["svnmucc: E160020: Path 't3' already exists"],
> + ["svnmucc: E160020: Path 't3' already exists, or was created
> "
> + "by an earlier operation"],
> '-m', '',
> 'put', sbox.ospath('file'), 't3',
> 'put', sbox.ospath('file'), 't3')
